Home / Business owners / Family management company
The family management company: the S-corp owner's route to paying kids tax-efficiently
The short answer
Hiring your children works beautifully for sole proprietors — but the moment your business is an S-corp, the under-18 FICA exemption disappears, because the exemption only applies when a parent (not a corporation) is the employer. The workaround with real legal footing: a family management company — a parent-owned sole proprietorship (or spousal partnership) that provides genuine services to your S-corp for a market-rate fee, and employs the kids itself. Done with substance, each child can earn up to the standard deduction — $16,100 in 2026 — with no federal income tax and no payroll tax. Done as paperwork with no real work behind it, it is exactly the structure examiners are trained to unwind.
How the structure works
- Form the FMC: a sole proprietorship owned by one parent (or a partnership owned only by the parents) — critically, NOT a corporation or an LLC taxed as one, or the FICA exemption dies again.
- Give it a real job: a written services agreement between the FMC and your S-corp — scheduling, admin support, social content, marketing assistance, organizing, whatever the kids will genuinely do.
- Price the fee at market: what an outside admin/marketing support vendor would charge for the same services. Invoice monthly; pay from the S-corp's account. The S-corp deducts the fee.
- The FMC employs the children: job descriptions, timesheets, market wages for the actual tasks, payment into the child's own account, W-2s at year-end. Under-18 wages from the parent's sole prop: exempt from Social Security and Medicare, and FUTA-exempt under 21.
- The child's side: wages up to $16,100 (2026) are absorbed by the standard deduction — federal income tax of zero — and earned income opens a Roth IRA, the longest compounding runway in the code.
- Mind the FMC's own tax: the fee income lands on the parent's Schedule C, offset by the kids' wages and FMC costs. The net should be modest by design — the FMC is a conduit for real work, not a profit center, and any small remainder faces SE tax at the parent level.
A worked example
Dana owns an S-corp agency. Her spouse forms an FMC that provides content and admin support to the agency for $2,400/month, documented and invoiced. The FMC employs their kids, 13 and 16, at market wages for tagging, filing, set assistance, and social clips.
The family payroll, one year (2026)
Illustrative only — the fee must survive a market-rate test, the wages must match the work, and California payroll and child-labor rules apply on top.
Where it fails (and how examiners see it)
- A management fee that happens to equal the kids' payroll to the dollar — reverse-engineering in plain sight
- No services agreement, no invoices, one December journal entry
- An FMC formed as an S-corp or C-corp — which re-triggers the very FICA problem it was built to solve
- Nine-year-olds "managing operations" at $16,000 a year
- Wages deposited back into the parents' account — the money must genuinely be the child's
Frequently asked questions
Why can't my S-corp just pay my kids directly?
It can — but corporate wages to your children are subject to Social Security and Medicare regardless of age. The FICA exemption for under-18 children only applies when the employer is a parent's sole proprietorship or a partnership owned solely by the parents. The family management company restores that structure.
How much can each child earn tax-free in 2026?
Wages up to the standard deduction — $16,100 in 2026 — generally produce zero federal income tax for the child, and earned income is not subject to the kiddie tax. The wage still has to match real, age-appropriate work.
What makes the management fee defensible?
The FMC must provide genuine services to the operating company — scheduling, admin, marketing support, content, bookkeeping help — under a written agreement, at a fee comparable to what an outside provider would charge, invoiced and actually paid. A fee reverse-engineered from the kids' payroll is the pattern that fails.
Is this a gray-area strategy?
The components are all established law: parents may employ their children, the under-18 FICA exemption is statutory, and management companies are ordinary business structures. What the IRS attacks is fiction — no real services, no real work, circular money. Built on substance, it's defensible; built as paperwork, it's not.
Want it built so it holds?
We set up the FMC, the services agreement, the fee study, the payroll, the W-2s, and the Roth accounts as one engagement — every link in the chain documented, because the documentation IS the strategy.
Book a free consultation